As Facebook announces measures to clamp down on fake news, can it really still claim not to be a media company?
Here’s an article I just read closely related to my post yesterday: Is the media responsible for Trump’s victory? (In a way you may not expect)
Is broadcast and print media not as influencial as it thinks it is?
See below for the full article:
“So, seeing an exposed bum (banned) is worse than seeing gruesome pictures of murders (allowed)? Talk about screwed up priorities.”
This comment has been ‘uprated’ 65 times, do you agree? What are your thoughts on this?
Apparently this new social network is attacking 31,000 new users every hour. Worth a look?
That’s a lot of beans for what I thought was a free service (apparently WhatsApp has a subscription fee of $1 a year?!).
FINALLY, A CASE STUDY ABOUT INSTITUTIONS THAT WORKS WITH EMEDIA.
I’ve just discovered you can change the language of Facebook to ‘English (Pirate)’, which amongst other things, changes ‘like’ to ‘arr’ and ‘friends’ to ‘me hearties’.
Terence and Hannah inform me that this is old news, but I don’t care.
This reminds me of a joke;
Q. ‘Why are Pirates?’
A. ‘Because they arrrr!!‘